Volvo C30

Anyone else following the upcoming Volvo C30?

If so, what are your thoughts?

"Shomare" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2006031621125016807%shomare@verizonnet...
> Anyone else following the upcoming Volvo C30?
>
> If so, what are your thoughts?

Looks like it will be a really good value car. Shame about the rear but I'm
sure it will grow on people.

I can see it being successful in the more expensive small car sector just as
the 1 series BMW is.

---
Sam

Shomare <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> Anyone else following the upcoming Volvo C30?
>
> If so, what are your thoughts?

It is just an S40 hatchback. Same chassis. They will market it as a
modern 1800ES and probably sell it at a premium as they do the C70. If
they do a good job, it could be a real fun car to drive. I loved my
1800E.

Here is what is being printed about it:

The C30 draws its lineage from both the Volvo Safety Car concept vehicle
and the two-seat 1800ES of the early 1970s. Volvo is counting on the C30
to attract new, younger customers to the brand. The curvy C30 moves
Volvo even further away from its ³boxy but good² image. The C30 shares a
platform with the Mazda3 and the European Ford Focus, and hopefully will
have similar driving characteristics.

There is an image at:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/r...sTrucks/Report
s/Images/0604new007.jpg

Another new Volvo is the 2007 S80. The 2007 S80 replaces the
eight-year-old flagship S80 sedan. It features a new 3.2-liter
six-cylinder engine or the smooth and refined V8 linked to an
all-wheel-drive system, a setup taken from the XC90 SUV. Volvo says the
S80 will challenge the best cars in the segment by virtue of its
³Scandinavian Luxury,² which it says is a combination of aesthetics and
technology that creates an intelligent functionality. Actually new S80
lost part of its ³intelligent functionality² in the design studio. The
small window behind the rear door, which has been a Volvo trademark for
four decades, makes way for a curvy rear roof post. This compromises
ease of rear access in favor of "me-too" styling.

There is an image at:
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/r...sTrucks/Report
s/Images/0604new004.jpg
--
Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '01 Volvos.
The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '01 through European Delivery.
http://home.earthlink.net/~rhodyman/volvo.html

On 2006-03-17 06:30:25 -0500, "Sam Smith" <(E-Mail Removed)> said:

> "Shomare" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:2006031621125016807%shomare@verizonnet...
>> Anyone else following the upcoming Volvo C30?
>>
>> If so, what are your thoughts?
>
> Looks like it will be a really good value car. Shame about the rear but
> I'm sure it will grow on people.
>
> I can see it being successful in the more expensive small car sector
> just as the 1 series BMW is.
>
> ---
> Sam

I like the rear. Identifies the car as a "Volvo". I know that the
tail design evokes strong responses from folks, I'm on the positive
side of the fence.