On 11 Jun 2004 08:39:35 -0700,
VM ((E-Mail Removed)) wrote:
> I'm thinking of purchasing a newer used Volvo and I was thinking of
> the 940, 960, or 850. But then I saw the 1999 Volvo C70. Wow!!
> My only fundamental question is: will it be as reliable as my Volvo
> 240DL? The first thing that came to mind was that (maybe) this Volvo
> was built after the Ford acquisition and that worried me very much.
> So, was Ford in control when the C70 was made? Will it be as
> dependable, trustworthy, and reliable as the other older Volvos or is
> it a Ford piece of crap (like the new Jaguars)?
First Jaguars have improved since Ford acquired them. As have
Aston-Martins. In this particular case, the C70 was designed before
the Ford acquisition.
> Honestly, My '89 240DL has been such a reliable car that it should
> meet those standards (I crashed into a light pole recently and nothing
> happened to it). It may look great but if it's not solidly built like
> my 240, then i really am not interested in it.
Second no modern Volvo (even ones made before Ford acquired Volvo) will
look like nothing happened to it after you run into a light-pole. One
general principle in automobile safety appears to be that crumple-zones
absorb the energy of the impact, and therefore reduce its consequences
on the occupants. As a consequence, the auto buys it, but your innards
are much happier.
Beverly
--
Bev A. Kupf
"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to lerne" -- Chaucer
|