I hate to do this, but this bugs me. As a classic Volvo owner, and
openly anti-new-Volvo, here's what bugs the crap out of me.
In the late 80's Suzuki had a Samurai that was prone to flip over.
Consumer Reports reported this and Suzuki sued them for it. Why? To
protect their reputation and market share. To this day Americans know
this and Suzuki is forced to build and sell the cheapest things they
can, with super warranties, trying to regain trust in the consumer.
Volvo, as a Swedish company is in "limp home mode", so Ford buys them
out. Well, Ford is in "limp-home-mode" and together these two companies
have a serious problem on their hands with these 1999-2001 cars.
So, rather than come clean with the consumer and make bad things good
-- they go defensive. They rather protect the bottom line, market
share, profits. To what expense? Consumer trust and loyalty.
I can understand the business logic in doing so -- but to what end? Do
they think we shall just forget this as time goes by?
Maybe the uninformed consumer whose only knowledge of Volvo is a tv ad,
or their reputation for safety, might buy this car -- those who know
will not.
Therefore, I strongly dislike the present Volvo corporation and cannot
in any way support what they are.
..02 cents,
Jamie
Jamie wrote:
> Here is an example of symptoms for a bad ETM:
> "
> What conditions might be evident if this system needs repair?
> Your vehicle may experience situations related to the affected
> Electronic Throttle System function in which the Check Engine Light or
> ETS light illuminate.
> Additional symptoms that may be associated with this condition include,
> uneven engine idle, and/or the onset of "limp home mode", a condition
> that affects drivability potentially restricting maximum vehicle speed
> to between approximately 10 and 30 miles per hour.
> Is this warranty extension a recall?
> This is not a recall campaign. As the limited warranty on the ETS has
> been extended, there is no corrective action required. Unless you
> experience the above mentioned symptoms you do not need to contact your
> retailer. At your next regularly scheduled service appointment or
> retailer visit after March 1, 2006 Volvo will install the upgraded
> software on your vehicle."
>
> http://www.matthewsvolvosite.com/cha...pic.php?t=5991
>
>
> Stuart wrote:
> > I haven't had the ETM replaced. I just got back from another 500 mile
> > round trip to Santa Barbra from Redwood City and the car ran like crap
> > again. One thing I did notice is that it is particullary bulky with the AC
> > on. When I turn the AC off it runs a lot better but still not well.
> >
> > Several things I've observed:
> >
> > 1). With the AC on and driving flat and level there is noticable bucking.
> > This seems to happen when the trottle is just barely open.
> > 2). On decents with the AC on the bucking becomes more pronounced as the
> > trottle completely closed. This seems to me like the AC control is trying
> > to crack the trottle a bit when it shouldn't.
> >
> > 3). The transmission (automatic) seem slow to kick down from OD into 4th
> > when taking a grade. In fact, I've depressed the accelorator almost to the
> > floor before it will kick down. Almost no noticeable increase in engine
> > output is observed when the trottle is depressed.
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> >
> > "Stuart" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:PCSxg.12488$(E-Mail Removed) t...
> > >I have 2000 S80 with 42K miles. Recently its been runing very strange at
> > >around 60-80 MPH. Very sluggish throttle response. The dealer says
> > >everything is ok but I think it runs like crap. I've been driving this car
> > >since new so I know what it normally drives like. He suggests changing to
> > >premium fuel but I think its more like a trottle control issue. Any body
> > >have any ideas?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Stuart
> > >
> > >
> > >