Robert Dietz wrote
Pull the spark plugs. Let the water out. See if engine will turn over.
Hopefully hydrolocking the motor didn't do major serious damage. If you
were moving at speed through the water it's not likely that that motor
will ever run again. Hydrolocking a motor will bend or snap connecting
rods. Running an engine with water in the crankcase will ruin the
bearings in a very short time (30 seconds or less).
I got the impression that this happened the day *after* he drove through
the high water, which sorta leaves out the hydrolocking[1]. I'd suspect
some electrical connection may have got yanked by the physical shock of
the wall of water, and it jiggled loose on his way to work the next day.
I'd expect a whole lot of fun looking around for loose wires.
Sounds the simplest explanation to me, and Occam makes very good razors.
If, on the other hand, it stopped *when* he drove through the water, I'd
agree with Robert, and suspect that the cost of installing a junkyard
engine may exceed the value of the car.
[1] I did this to a Plymouth Breeze last year. I drove through about 8-10
inches of water in a car the same way I do with a truck (by which I mean a
Freightliner, we usually drive a Century Class), namely, just give it gas
and see how large a wave you can make. The air intake for a Century class
sits at about 7 feet up off the ground.
The ground effects on the Breeze dug down into the water, and pushed some
up onto the curve of the bumper. At that point, it turned into a bow
wave. I saw that start, and realized the extent of my stupidity and
reached to shut the engine off. Too late, it sucked water while turning
about 2500-3000 rpm. Total loss (94 Breeze, 124000 miles, worth three
hundred less than the cost of the engine).