Choice of two volvos for a family car, advice please

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Shirl, Dec 10, 2003.

  1. Shirl

    Shirl Guest

    Hello

    After deciding on a volvo as my 'new' car, I have been presented with two
    options.

    1) S40 1998 with 20,000 on the clock. It has been owned from new by an old
    couple and the bodywork is in very good condition.

    2) S40 2001 with 22,000 on the clock.

    Both are petrol and are manual. There is approx £3,000 difference in the
    price of these two cars. Now I tend to keep my cars for a long time, i've
    had my trusty fiat for 8 years and the only reason im getting rid of it is
    because its starting to show its age and I need something more reliable and
    safe with three children.

    I would like to buy the cheaper car but fear that im just going from one
    'older' car to another.

    I've been doing research on the net and discovered that there were a few
    faults with older model s40's. Would this be a good enough reason to pay
    £3000 more?

    Basically, I will keep this car long term and I wont be putting huge miles
    in, but apart from putting in oil/water etc, I have no mechanical experience
    and will need to have everything fixed at a garage.

    Thankyou for any advice/comments

    Shirley
     
    Shirl, Dec 10, 2003
    #1
  2. Shirl

    Coop Guest

    Hello Shirley

    If you are un-decided on which car to purchase then because you have stated
    they are the same model S40 then personally i would be tempted to go for the
    older version considering it is £3000 less. Looking at the mileage i would
    imagine that the newer model has been used as a company car whilst the older
    model as you stated as been owned by an older driver (you noticed cars for
    sale always seemed to have been owned by an elderly person).

    Hope that has helped any

    Coop
     
    Coop, Dec 10, 2003
    #2
  3. Shirl

    James Sweet Guest

    I would go for whichever one is in nicer shape, '98 hardly strikes me as an
    "older" car, it's practically new! Did anything even change between those
    years on that model? Does one have features you want that the other lacks?
    Age is largely irrelevant when it comes to reliability, a car could be 30
    years old and very reliable if it was well maintained, I've seen 2 year old
    cars that were falling apart simply out of neglect.
     
    James Sweet, Dec 10, 2003
    #3
  4. Shirl

    Taipan Guest

    The S40 Phase II was introduced in 2000 and made a number of improvements to
    the S40/V40 not least of all the handling with a wider track and improved
    suspension. The Phase II changes also brought a revised interior with more
    up-to-date switchgear, a new instrument cluster and also some subtle tweaks
    to the exterior.

    As I only have a Phase II S40 and have never driven the former revision, I
    honestly couldn't tell you whether it's worth an extra £3k but seemingly
    there were a lot of negative reviews about the handling and general dynamics
    of the initial model so I guess the best thing to do, if possible, is
    test-drive both and make your own mind up.
     
    Taipan, Dec 11, 2003
    #4
  5. Shirl

    Shirl Guest

    Thanks for your advice guys.

    Well I did go for the test drive as soon as both cars were in stock. I went
    out in the older model, which it turns out had only 19000 miles on it. The
    bodywork on it is perfect and it does actually still look like a new car!
    We took it on the motorway and it had no trouble getting up to good speeds
    and still feeling solid (im used to a little fiat remember!)

    The main reason I asked on here for advice is because as a female knowing
    nothing about cars, I was worried that the salesman would try and just get
    me to sign up for the most expensive car. However, whilst driving back to
    the garage, I asked him what did he think of the car and he said that if it
    was him, he would go for the cheaper car as its in such good condition and
    as a mechanic he was sure that there was no difference in it as both cars
    were sound. The newer car did have perks like air con, but was it going to
    be worth all the extra money??

    So that was that, I didnt even bother test driving the other volvo. I've
    got a good quality car and im £3000 better off!

    So thanks again for your input, much appreciated

    Shirley
     
    Shirl, Dec 12, 2003
    #5
  6. Very low mileage cars may need maintenance based on time limits (e.g.
    "change oil every x,000 miles or y months"). So you may want to compare
    the records with the recommendations in the manual.

    Also note that very low mileage cars may have been subjected to lots
    of short trips or city driving, which is harder on the car than highway
    driving. Odometer fraud can also be a concern.
     
    Timothy J. Lee, Dec 14, 2003
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.