S60 vs G35 vs Acura TL 3.2

Discussion in 'Volvo S60' started by pkallis, Apr 4, 2004.

  1. pkallis

    pkallis Guest

    Fellow listers,

    Some advice please:

    In the universe of choices for a medium sized luxury sedan, our decision
    has become more complex, after looking at and test driving a G35 sedan
    yesterday. It's a pretty tempting car, snazzy on the styling and
    interior appointments, fast as hell (over 90 mph on the test drive),
    good handling and roomy.

    However, the other two cars, the S60 and the Acura TL are equally
    tempting. So far, the advantages of the S60 are proven reliability and
    longevity (my '96 850 has over 274,000 miles on it with NO major
    problems - essentially the same engine as the S60 non-turbo), good
    handling, utility, nice dash and interior layout and size, good resale
    value, classical and pleasing styling and safety features.

    The Acura does everything right, but does not have the Volvo's or the
    Infiniti's dash layout, has unknown (to me) reliability, but just about
    everything else is just fine.

    The Infiniti sure has some panache to it - so much snazz that you almost
    feel guilty about it.

    Price is a consideration, but it's still a tough choice and I don't want
    emotion to leak into this decision.

    Given your collective experiences, what are your views?

    Thanks....


    PS. We do NOT want to use premium grade fuel.
     
    pkallis, Apr 4, 2004
    #1
  2. pkallis

    Rob Guenther Guest

    All three of those care recommend premium. It's bad for an engine designed
    to run on premium to run regular, if the sensor dies to adjust the timing
    you can really mess up the motor if it starts knocking.

    I like the Volvo the best, the Acura is really nice too, and probably less
    money to maintain.

    The G35 has a garbage (cheaply made) interior, tho it looks flashy and
    "nice" (not to me)... It's actually quite cheap in there. The whole car
    doesn't appeal to me, everyone seems to have it, and the styling isn't
    timeless enough for my tastes.
     
    Rob Guenther, Apr 4, 2004
    #2
  3. pkallis

    Steve S Guest

    We have the S60 N/A - premium (91 octane or above) is recommended, and
    makes a noticable difference on performance especially and mileage
    compared to regular. Complaints with the S60 - this car shrunk down
    to a compact compared to the midsized S70. That combined with the
    styling (i.e. aero sloping) of the back has made the rear seat area a
    very bad design if you need any functionality out of it. I have had
    850 as loaners twice - although the S60 is more nimble, you will be
    disappointed in the size compared to your current 850. I.e., the
    utility of the S60 is less. As far as resale, we are looking to get
    rid of the S60, but are completely shocked at how awful resale is -
    that is why we have been dragging our feet some. Would suggest
    seriously considering your other 2 choices.
     
    Steve S, Apr 5, 2004
    #3
  4. pkallis

    John Horner Guest

    All published reports (CR, etc.) put Acura very high on the reliability
    scale, so I would not worry about that.

    All three are good vehicles. Buy the one you like the best!

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 8, 2004
    #4
  5. pkallis

    John Horner Guest

    How important is back seat room? I found the S60 especially small in the
    back seat as compared to our 850.

    Volvo seemed to shrink the interior 1/2 size in going from the 850 to the
    S60 and they also really shrunk the engine compartment. As someone who does
    my own work, the tight fit of the S60 engine compartment bothers me.

    John
     
    John Horner, Apr 8, 2004
    #5
  6. That's the major problem with the car. The back seat is terribly small,
    I'd rather have the car less pretty on the outside and functional on the
    inside. I also don't like that Volvo has abandoned tight turning
    circles. The old 240s had very tight turning circles, the 700/900s were
    also tight and only slightly larger, the front drive 850s/s70s increased
    it about a foot, still acceptable. However, the front drivers have
    horribly wide turning circles. Maybe it is time to dump transverse
    engines, if that's what is accounting for these horrid turning circles.
    Volvo needs to get back to making cars functional inside. The pretty
    exteriors are nice, but shouldn't compromised the cars as much as they
    do. I'm unimpressed with the starkness of the new s40s and some of the
    downscale materials inside, however its back seat is larger than the s60
    (but seats are nowhere near as plush and comfortable). I want better
    visibility from Volvo, a back seat in all the midsized cars at least as
    large as the v70 (which isn't that great). The s80s back seat space is
    superb. It also has better visibility. The oldest car in the Volvo line
    is the most comfortable. However, the SUV, the xc90 is also superb
    inside, with good visibility and a simple interior that works and feels
    premium.

    Ben
     
    Benjamin Smith, Apr 13, 2004
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.