Thinking about buy Volvo S40

Discussion in 'Volvo S40' started by jdbugman, May 2, 2004.

  1. jdbugman

    jdbugman Guest

    I am think a about buying a 2004/5 Volvo S40 2.5T. I was just wondering if
    anyone had any opinions on it... good, bad, or indifferent.

    Thanks,

    Joe
     
    jdbugman, May 2, 2004
    #1
  2. jdbugman

    Acer Guest

    Hi,

    I have the new V50 2.0D Elite version.
    I drove now about 4000 km, in 3 weeks time, most of them at the highway.

    Until today no bad experience, very good enigne, quality of used material
    inside is much better then the older S/V40.
    It's the first Volvo based on the new Ford Platform, (which is also used by
    the news Focus C-Max).
    Stability on the road on high speeds is really great !

    It's my first Volvo after buying Ford, Toyota, Audi and BMW. My next will be
    again a Volvo
     
    Acer, May 2, 2004
    #2
  3. 2004 and before models are Volvo. 2005 is a reworked Mazda, which
    can be had from Mazda for a lot less money.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, May 2, 2004
    #3
  4. jdbugman

    Acer Guest

    This is not the case in Europe where the build the S40/V50, they are builded
    from scratch and don't have any part of Mazda. !!
    The only have the new Ford Motor Company platform, which is identical to
    Focus C-Max, and a new coming Jaguar.
    The engine is builded by Ford and PSA Group.

    Some pictures of the European version of the V50

    http://users.pandora.be/hans.hantson/IMG_1101.JPG

    http://users.pandora.be/hans.hantson/IMG_1102.JPG

    http://users.pandora.be/hans.hantson/IMG_1104.JPG
     
    Acer, May 2, 2004
    #4
  5. jdbugman

    Rob Guenther Guest

    He means that the new Mazda 3 is also built on the same platform... It is,
    the platform is the same for NA and European versions.

    Not sure if you can get the Mazda 3 (new Protege) in Europe, but it uses
    this small Volvo's platform.

    Engine built by Ford and PSA group? It looks to be most definately a Volvo
    unit - 5 cylinder turbo... come on, who else does that (aside from Audi
    10-20 years ago)
     
    Rob Guenther, May 3, 2004
    #5
  6. jdbugman

    Acer Guest

    It's real the Engine is build by a new company setup by Ford Motor Company
    and PSA.
    The certificated of the engine is real clear in this.

    I'm speaking about the new 2.0D engine with 136 PK and 6 gears.
     
    Acer, May 3, 2004
    #6
  7. jdbugman

    Rob Guenther Guest

    Oh the diesel? We don't get that in North America, thus we get absolutely no
    details on it... I'm hoping we get a diesel boom when the low sulphur fuels
    arrive in a couple years. I'm running a TDI Golf right now, for commuting,
    and it's a huge money saver!
     
    Rob Guenther, May 3, 2004
    #7
  8. 2004 and before could be considered reworked Mitsubishi. I wouldn't call
    the 2005 s40 a reworked Mazda. It is a joint platform with Ford and
    Mazda. Ford and Mazda don't use 4 strengths of steel in their structure
    or the side beams used in Volvos doors. The new s40 uses a 5 cylinder
    engine based on the one in the s60 and v70. It's tuned like a Volvo, I
    drove one. Interior doesn't thrill me but its Volvo, there's no sign of
    other cars within.

    Ben
     
    Benjamin Smith, May 6, 2004
    #8
  9. jdbugman

    Sammy Guest

    Save your money and buy a Mazda 3, if you can get one where you live.
    The Ford Focus, Mazda 3 and the new Volvo S40, share the same
    platform. As one reviewer on TV said, is it worth spending +$10K for
    a rebadged Mazda?

    Make sure to stay clear from the previous S40. Which shared platform
    with the Mitsubishi Charisma.

    IMO, both cars, the new and the old, are NOT worth what you pay for.
    Do a Google search on "volvo s40 problem".

    Nowadays, the new Volvos are the best car to buy if you enjoy frequent
    trips to the dealer (like, at least once a month...).
     
    Sammy, May 13, 2004
    #9
  10. jdbugman

    Jorge Luis Guest

    Old S40 was quite cheap (less than 20,000 euro) and many people was
    happy with them. I also I'm really happy, and still without problems
    nor repair works (5 years, 80000 km)

    Bye

    Jorge Luis
     
    Jorge Luis, May 18, 2004
    #10
  11. I drove S40 in the wet for a while on test, normally I drive a turbo 740 .It
    the S40 was a stable nice car very controlled good traction control
    excellent cruise control absolutely spot on accurate, electronic accelerator
    was interesting a it was brand new it had a slight lag at a quick start
    ..Rear view was poor through back window , but excellent mirrors which set up
    perfectly every time the set was moved to the correct line of sight.Electric
    seats control and memory was very handy .Gear box was a delight very nice
    indeed . Brakes, Volvo brakes wonderful handling good steering very good
    turning circle amazing for a fwd car in fact I was surprised ,over all very
    safe goes well and the turbo would be a wise choice 125 kw vs 165kw 40
    extra stallions a good buy .ONLY problem is what colour or color as the
    yanks say ?
     
    John Robertson, Jun 2, 2004
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.