thinking of buying 1992 960 sedan

Discussion in 'Volvo 960' started by Dan Finn, Aug 15, 2003.

  1. Dan Finn

    Dan Finn Guest

    Im reading alot about the cracked engine blocks on the 1992 960. We
    found a 1992 960 with all maintenance records for sale in the dc metro
    area. It is a young 165k miles. ;-) If it hasn't had the engine crack
    yet, is it safe to assume that this was not one of the defective
    engines?

    I'm looking at getting it as a daily driver with an average of 1k
    miles a week.

    thanks,

    dan
     
    Dan Finn, Aug 15, 2003
    #1
  2. Dan, 1992 is the year that was more likely to have timing belt problems and
    lunch the top end of the motor. Make sure it has had a TB change within the
    last 20k or plan on doing it immediately. Also, make sure it had the Volvo
    TB mod done to it (a balancing flywheel on one of the cams to dampen
    vibration? Should have been done for NC at the dealer with the first TB
    change.

    Good luck,
    Chuck B
     
    news.verizon.net, Aug 15, 2003
    #2
  3. Dan Finn

    Robert Smith Guest

    Got a '92 960 with 222,000 kms on the clock. I would have thought, if
    the engine block problem was to manifest at all, it would definitely
    have done so long ago. I understood it wasn't a case of cracked
    blocks, more in the line of porous blocks. So they'd just ooze vital
    fluids right through the block. A kind of Ebola for engines.

    Otherwise, and timing belts aside, our only problems with the 960 over
    the last year have been minor electrical stuff, and the PNP switch -
    $400 CDN / $250 US. I doubt we could have made a better choice when we
    bought it - roomy, dependable, safe, and still fun to drive. Hard
    combination to beat.

    Robert Smith
     
    Robert Smith, Aug 16, 2003
    #3
  4. Dan Finn

    L.A. Guest

    Both my 960s needed trannys before 150K, so evaluate it closely.
     
    L.A., Aug 16, 2003
    #4
  5. the timing belt is a big issue, if your not sure have it changed, Id be more
    concerned about the tranny.ours went at 180,000 and a year later the rebuilt
    one, over1800.00 dollars is not much better, its all about the lock up
    converter,sometimes it shudders when you come to a stop.it forgets to
    unlock,kind of like a manual car when you dont put the clutch in.the steering
    rack was also a weak point, and the power seats will develop a mind of their
    own. the 940 has the same body, but would probably be way more dependable and
    serviceable,i forgot to mention the radiator that was plastic and the neck
    where the top hose is attached broke. these have a maximum life of ten years.
    but i love my 88 240, not as fancy, but you can always depend on it 250,000
    miles, and most everything original. mark
     
    Islandguy77554, Aug 17, 2003
    #5
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.