Timing belt replacement

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Pier1, Oct 18, 2004.

  1. Pier1

    Pier1 Guest

    hello all. My 1996 850 ( non-turbo ) has 52K miles on it and I wonder how
    soon I should replace the timing belt. I just have the transmission
    rebuilted and I don't want any more surprised any time soon.

    The manual says to replace the timing belt at 70K miles but a mechanic I
    know says to replace right away because the car is over eight years old.
    Should I replace it right now at 52K miles? Has anyone had any problem
    with the timing belt earlier than 70K miles regardless of the age of the
    car?

    Any comment would be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you,

    Pier
     
    Pier1, Oct 18, 2004
    #1
  2. Pier1

    Jeremy Guest

    Do it now - saves a nasty surprise - I don't know about any specific
    Volvo issues, but I've read reports recently of other cars where the
    belt has failed before the recommended change interval (isolated cases
    no doubt).
     
    Jeremy, Oct 18, 2004
    #2
  3. Pier1

    Bev A. Kupf Guest

    I think you should replace it. It's been 8 years; undoubtedly the rubber
    has aged and cracked. Your car has an interference engine, and if the
    belt should snap unexpectedly it will be expensive to fix.
     
    Bev A. Kupf, Oct 18, 2004
    #3
  4. i agree,change it now. Incidentally,does anyone know of a database
    which details cars/makes/models which dont have/have interference
    engines??
     
    tarquinlinbin, Oct 18, 2004
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.