R
Robert Lutwak
So is it true, or just self-fulfilling expectations that Volvo quality and
engineering have degraded since the Ford takeover? Some posts here claim
they'd rather drive an old 850 than a new S60. Is this just stingy people
(like myself) justifying their inability to buy new or is there such a
substantive safety or reliability advantage to the pre-Ford Volvos?
One feature that has kept me in Volvos all these years is the
super-redundant braking system (dual redundant cylinders at all four disks
and separate drums for the handbrake). I always figured this would be first
to go under Ford and replaced with the standard Amercian
one-cylinder-per-wheel geometry. Has this happened?
How about the frame? Excluding the '40 series, have the high-end Volvos
gone to unibody yet?
Personally, I think there are probably areas where Ford engineering could
help the Volvos - alternator, wiring, air conditioning, perhaps even the
auto tranny...
engineering have degraded since the Ford takeover? Some posts here claim
they'd rather drive an old 850 than a new S60. Is this just stingy people
(like myself) justifying their inability to buy new or is there such a
substantive safety or reliability advantage to the pre-Ford Volvos?
One feature that has kept me in Volvos all these years is the
super-redundant braking system (dual redundant cylinders at all four disks
and separate drums for the handbrake). I always figured this would be first
to go under Ford and replaced with the standard Amercian
one-cylinder-per-wheel geometry. Has this happened?
How about the frame? Excluding the '40 series, have the high-end Volvos
gone to unibody yet?
Personally, I think there are probably areas where Ford engineering could
help the Volvos - alternator, wiring, air conditioning, perhaps even the
auto tranny...