James said:
Todays standards or not, they're still very safe cars. Many thousands of
people have walked away from real world accidents in 2/7/9 series Volvos
over the years and they're no less safe than they were back then. This can
be argued until hell freezes over, but IMO you reach a point where a car is
"safe enough" and beyond that are diminishing returns. I also take crash
test data with a grain of salt, what really matters are the results of real
world crashes that occur every day.
There are several aspects to what you say. If I had to sit in a
20year-old-car when two old cars crash I would also prefer to sit in a
240. But I would definetely not like to sit in a 240 or 7-/9-series
Volvo when a crash with a current Volvo or another premium brand car
would occur.
Someone cited that in a given year nobody was killed in a crash with a
240. I love to hear that but the population of 240 in the US is so small
in the meantime that this fact is not proving anything.
What I would like to point out is that Volvos probably are still the
best compared to their contemporary competitors in terms of crash
safety. Development in this area was so dramatic in the last two decades
that old Volvos cannot compete anymore with todays average cars.
I'm driving my 5th Volvo now and the main reason to drive a V70 is the
outstanding quality of the crash protection but other things like the
general quality, the comfort, the space last but not least the image of
the car are also very important.
Joerg
P.S.: Sorry for my lousy English but my mother tongue is German.