justallan said:
Thanks, James... A bit more effort than I thought then. I have the
opportunity to purchase a nice 1978 wagon (with slipping auto) and
have access to a badly rusted 1984 (manual). Which is why I was
thinking about doing the swap. Maybe I'm better off just waiting
until I find another wagon that is already a manual. (Or just fix the
auto.)
But I've heard in the past something about automatics use more fuel
than manuals. Is that true? If so, what kind of economy difference
would we be talking about?
It's really not that bad, especially if you have access to a parts car.
Several years ago I converted my mom's 240 wagon to a manual in a
weekend, it's just a matter of swapping parts around. Since you're
dealing with older cars you don't have to worry about the crank sensor
and drilled flywheel, that didn't come about until the late 80s. You can
replace just half the driveshaft (they plug together) but if you have a
parts car you might want to just pull the whole shaft to make sure it
stays balanced. Also there's a few tricky nuts that hold the pedal
assembly in, I found it easiest to pull the instrument cluster to access
them. You'll probably want to buy a new clutch kit for the job, that
will come with the pilot bearing you need to stick in the end of the
crank, if the old bushing is stuck you can get pilot bearing pullers
pretty cheaply. If you decide to go through with it feel free to ping me
with questions.
It varies by car, but just for reference the '86 240 wagon I did came
with a AW70 4 speed automatic and got about 24 mpg highway and after the
conversion to a M47 5 speed manual it jumped up to 29 mpg. If I swapped
the rear axle ratio to the taller gearing normally used in the manual
cars it would likely push it up over 30 mpg so the difference can be
substantial. Another bonus is the car feels so much more responsive and
powerful without the slushbox sapping away all that power.