M
\MIDIcian\ \(tm\)
Gee, all of a sudden the right-wing extremists promoting Palestinian
terrorism are silent????
Oh well, I'm gonna present this anyway - - - -
9-11 reasons to call Muslims "terrorists"
By Reuven Koret October 22, 2003
Great news! Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said Tuesday that he
would be willing to come to Israel under certain conditions. "I would
[visit] after the Jewish leadership would go the Muslim countries and
explain why they call Muslims 'terrorists,'" he said. "That would be fair.
Then I will go to Tel Aviv and explain why I said what I said."
Well, Your Excellency, I may not be a Jewish leader, and we may not be
allowed to set foot in any Muslim country, but I would love to take you up
on your challenge, though I must admit to being taken aback by the
simplicity of your question.
I would have expected a more difficult challenge. I thought perhaps you
would request that we Israelis would learn to stand patiently in a line, or
perhaps start driving defensively. Indeed, the ease of the answer to your
question proves to me that you must be just dying to visit us in Tel Aviv.
And why not, Mahathir? If, as you claim, we Jews rule the world, why not be
close to the center of global power, the hub of world domination? If, as you
apparently believe, we get the whole world to fight our wars by proxy, hey,
why not come on down and learn from the masters of persuasion?
So, just to make sure you get the chance to hop on an El Al jet and visit
the Holy Land, you ask us a powderpuff question that even the simple son
could answer on Passover. Very clever, Your Excellency! You're catching on
already.
I am tempted to say that a harder question would be finding reasons not to
call Muslims "terrorists." To be clear, I am in no way implying that all
Muslims are terrorists. But to imply, as you seem to be doing, that it is
somehow difficult to find reasons to call Muslims "terrorists," or, for that
matter, to find Muslim terrorists, well, sir, you are certainly assuring
your prompt arrival on the shores of the Zionist entity.
Still, I would hate to miss the opportunity to host you in the Jewish
Homeland, so I will bite at your bait as if it were lox on a line, herring
on a hook.
I know you believe that increasingly, Jews are foolish enough to believe the
various peace plans being offered by the Arabs, just as the Jews in the time
of the original Mohammed back in the 8th century bought the phony and
temporary pact he offered at Hudaibiyah. It is a precedent you cited as
proof that we Jews can be lured into mistakes, believing in the various
false promises your co-religionists repeatedly offer us.
But to explain why one would call Muslims "terrorists"? You must be joking.
I realize you wouldn't consider it objective if we Jews were to define
terrorism, so let's make do with the U.S. State Department definition. Yes,
yes, I know that for you, the people over at State are just Zionist tools,
proxies for their warmonger overlords in Jerusalem.
But hey, for whatever reason: somebody over there in Foggy Bottom seems to
have a foggy idea about what constitutes a terrorist attack:
"(1) The hijacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft,
vessel, or vehicle).
"(2) The seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue
to detain, another individual in order compel a third person (including a
governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an
explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or
detained.
(3) A violent attack upon an internationally protected person or upon the
liberty of such a person.
(4) An assassination.
(5) The use on any biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or
device, or
(6) explosive or firearm (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with
intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more
individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.
(7) A threat, attempt, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
Gosh, do you really need any examples of Muslim involvement in each and
every one of the foregoing, anywhere (everywhere) in the world? Do you have
a few days to remember? Suffice it to raise just a few brief reminders, none
of which occurred in Israel: Entebbe, Achille Lauro, Munich, Daniel Pearl,
World Trade Center. And there are a few thousand more where those came from.
In the last few years.
But actually, Mr. Prime Minister, I recognize you weren't asking for a
definition of terrorism but of "terrorist." The State Department has
something to say about that as well:
"One who knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support to any
individual, organization, or government in conducting a terrorist activity
at any time, including any of the following acts: "(1) The preparation or
planning of a terrorist activity."(2) the gathering of information on
potential targets for terrorist activity."(3) The providing of any type of
material support, including a safe house, transportation, communication,
funds, false identification, weapons, explosives, or training, to any
individual the actor knows or has reason to believe has committed or plans
to commit a terrorist activity. "(4) The soliciting of funds or other things
of value for terrorist activity of for any terrorist organization. "(5) The
solicitation of any individual for membership in a terrorist organization,
terrorist government, or to engage in a terrorist activity."
So how many is that? 10? 12? 9? 11? Well, I guess I've lost count of reasons
why one might call Muslims "terrorists." But you may be thinking: "I don't
care what you call me, just call me"? Well, Mr. Prime Minister, we Jews are
calling you!
So, Your Excellency, without further ado: start packing!
We've prepared a VIP itinerary just for you. I look forward to showing you
where the Elders of Zion meet (on a daily basis, as they are choosing
lottery numbers) to plot world domination. We can go to the beach, where the
Israeli girls are plotting in their bikinis how to seduce Arab leaders. We
can visit the blood matzah factory and you can sample the wares. We can eat
the chickpeas so you can see and smell how we prepare poison gas.
You said it yourself: "It cannot be that there is no other way; 1.3 billion
Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews." Ah, but it can be.
Indeed, sir, we are showing you how: just ask, and we will try to answer.
Learn from the People of the Book and next time you'll ask us a harder
question. Maybe next time we'll need to look it up.
But I must say, yes, Mr. Prime Minister! I agree with you when you said:
"For well over half a century we have fought over Palestine. What have we
achieved? Nothing. We are worse off than before." That is wise. If only
those who support the armed struggle would learn!
Indeed, you are so wise in matters of statecraft that it occurs to me that
there can be only one explanation for the dumb question you want us to
answer in order to invite you to our country, and exercise your "right of
return" with far more right than Palestinian Muslims, whether terrorists or
not.
Mahathir Mohamad, you don't need to explain to me why you said what you
said. Since you clearly have a yiddische kopf, it's pretty obvious: you must
be Jewish!
You may want to save some of your next questions for your Mom.
But, in the meantime, please repeat after me: "L'shana haba b'yerushalayim.
Next year in Jerusalem!"
Mahathir, I hope you enjoy falafel with your gefilte fish.
terrorism are silent????
Oh well, I'm gonna present this anyway - - - -
9-11 reasons to call Muslims "terrorists"
By Reuven Koret October 22, 2003
Great news! Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said Tuesday that he
would be willing to come to Israel under certain conditions. "I would
[visit] after the Jewish leadership would go the Muslim countries and
explain why they call Muslims 'terrorists,'" he said. "That would be fair.
Then I will go to Tel Aviv and explain why I said what I said."
Well, Your Excellency, I may not be a Jewish leader, and we may not be
allowed to set foot in any Muslim country, but I would love to take you up
on your challenge, though I must admit to being taken aback by the
simplicity of your question.
I would have expected a more difficult challenge. I thought perhaps you
would request that we Israelis would learn to stand patiently in a line, or
perhaps start driving defensively. Indeed, the ease of the answer to your
question proves to me that you must be just dying to visit us in Tel Aviv.
And why not, Mahathir? If, as you claim, we Jews rule the world, why not be
close to the center of global power, the hub of world domination? If, as you
apparently believe, we get the whole world to fight our wars by proxy, hey,
why not come on down and learn from the masters of persuasion?
So, just to make sure you get the chance to hop on an El Al jet and visit
the Holy Land, you ask us a powderpuff question that even the simple son
could answer on Passover. Very clever, Your Excellency! You're catching on
already.
I am tempted to say that a harder question would be finding reasons not to
call Muslims "terrorists." To be clear, I am in no way implying that all
Muslims are terrorists. But to imply, as you seem to be doing, that it is
somehow difficult to find reasons to call Muslims "terrorists," or, for that
matter, to find Muslim terrorists, well, sir, you are certainly assuring
your prompt arrival on the shores of the Zionist entity.
Still, I would hate to miss the opportunity to host you in the Jewish
Homeland, so I will bite at your bait as if it were lox on a line, herring
on a hook.
I know you believe that increasingly, Jews are foolish enough to believe the
various peace plans being offered by the Arabs, just as the Jews in the time
of the original Mohammed back in the 8th century bought the phony and
temporary pact he offered at Hudaibiyah. It is a precedent you cited as
proof that we Jews can be lured into mistakes, believing in the various
false promises your co-religionists repeatedly offer us.
But to explain why one would call Muslims "terrorists"? You must be joking.
I realize you wouldn't consider it objective if we Jews were to define
terrorism, so let's make do with the U.S. State Department definition. Yes,
yes, I know that for you, the people over at State are just Zionist tools,
proxies for their warmonger overlords in Jerusalem.
But hey, for whatever reason: somebody over there in Foggy Bottom seems to
have a foggy idea about what constitutes a terrorist attack:
"(1) The hijacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft,
vessel, or vehicle).
"(2) The seizing or detaining, and threatening to kill, injure, or continue
to detain, another individual in order compel a third person (including a
governmental organization) to do or abstain from doing any act as an
explicit or implicit condition for the release of the individual seized or
detained.
(3) A violent attack upon an internationally protected person or upon the
liberty of such a person.
(4) An assassination.
(5) The use on any biological agent, chemical agent, or nuclear weapon or
device, or
(6) explosive or firearm (other than for mere personal monetary gain), with
intent to endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more
individuals or to cause substantial damage to property.
(7) A threat, attempt, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
Gosh, do you really need any examples of Muslim involvement in each and
every one of the foregoing, anywhere (everywhere) in the world? Do you have
a few days to remember? Suffice it to raise just a few brief reminders, none
of which occurred in Israel: Entebbe, Achille Lauro, Munich, Daniel Pearl,
World Trade Center. And there are a few thousand more where those came from.
In the last few years.
But actually, Mr. Prime Minister, I recognize you weren't asking for a
definition of terrorism but of "terrorist." The State Department has
something to say about that as well:
"One who knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support to any
individual, organization, or government in conducting a terrorist activity
at any time, including any of the following acts: "(1) The preparation or
planning of a terrorist activity."(2) the gathering of information on
potential targets for terrorist activity."(3) The providing of any type of
material support, including a safe house, transportation, communication,
funds, false identification, weapons, explosives, or training, to any
individual the actor knows or has reason to believe has committed or plans
to commit a terrorist activity. "(4) The soliciting of funds or other things
of value for terrorist activity of for any terrorist organization. "(5) The
solicitation of any individual for membership in a terrorist organization,
terrorist government, or to engage in a terrorist activity."
So how many is that? 10? 12? 9? 11? Well, I guess I've lost count of reasons
why one might call Muslims "terrorists." But you may be thinking: "I don't
care what you call me, just call me"? Well, Mr. Prime Minister, we Jews are
calling you!
So, Your Excellency, without further ado: start packing!
We've prepared a VIP itinerary just for you. I look forward to showing you
where the Elders of Zion meet (on a daily basis, as they are choosing
lottery numbers) to plot world domination. We can go to the beach, where the
Israeli girls are plotting in their bikinis how to seduce Arab leaders. We
can visit the blood matzah factory and you can sample the wares. We can eat
the chickpeas so you can see and smell how we prepare poison gas.
You said it yourself: "It cannot be that there is no other way; 1.3 billion
Muslims cannot be defeated by a few million Jews." Ah, but it can be.
Indeed, sir, we are showing you how: just ask, and we will try to answer.
Learn from the People of the Book and next time you'll ask us a harder
question. Maybe next time we'll need to look it up.
But I must say, yes, Mr. Prime Minister! I agree with you when you said:
"For well over half a century we have fought over Palestine. What have we
achieved? Nothing. We are worse off than before." That is wise. If only
those who support the armed struggle would learn!
Indeed, you are so wise in matters of statecraft that it occurs to me that
there can be only one explanation for the dumb question you want us to
answer in order to invite you to our country, and exercise your "right of
return" with far more right than Palestinian Muslims, whether terrorists or
not.
Mahathir Mohamad, you don't need to explain to me why you said what you
said. Since you clearly have a yiddische kopf, it's pretty obvious: you must
be Jewish!
You may want to save some of your next questions for your Mom.
But, in the meantime, please repeat after me: "L'shana haba b'yerushalayim.
Next year in Jerusalem!"
Mahathir, I hope you enjoy falafel with your gefilte fish.