Struts/shocks for 850 GLT- replacement opinions?

Discussion in 'Volvo 850' started by jbcrow, Apr 1, 2005.

  1. jbcrow

    jbcrow Guest

    Hi,
    I'm in need of replacing my shocks and struts on my 93 850. My
    local Volvo mechanic does not recommend OEM replacements, which I
    believe are Boge. He recommends Bilstein Touring Shocks as
    replacements. He seems to imply that the OEM shocks and struts are a
    waste of money. Is this a common opinion? I can get a good deal on the
    OEM shocks, just don't want to be wasting time and money if they are
    not so good. Any input would be appreciated.

    TIA,
    JB
     
    jbcrow, Apr 1, 2005
    #1
  2. jbcrow

    Glenn Klein Guest

    Just Make sure that he changes the upper shock mounts when he changes
    the front shocks


    --
    "*-344-*Never Forgotten"
    Is for the New York City Firemen who lost their lives on September 11,2001.
    The official count is 343, but there was also a volunteer who lost his life
    aiding in the initial rescue efforts. And I will never forget them as
    long as I live,
    nor should any American.
     
    Glenn Klein, Apr 1, 2005
    #2
  3. jbcrow

    grtdane63 Guest

    I put Boge Turbo gas struts and shocks on my 93 940 wagon and am very
    pleased, only have 10 k miles on them so far.
     
    grtdane63, Apr 1, 2005
    #3
  4. I replaced the OEM shocks with the Bilstein touring shocks, they gave a
    pretty decent ride - good solid road feel but a little stiffer than I had
    expected from shocks not marketed as "sporty". I don't have any OEM
    benchmark to compare it to however, when I bought the car the shocks on it
    were beyond dead and I needed new front mounts on both sides. They were
    noisily rattling around while I drove. Getting the weird little star shaped
    nut off on the passenger side was *miserable* but the driver's side was a
    breeze. I'd suggest the IPD tool.

    This was on a wagon, a friend with an 850R sedan used the Bilstein top of
    the line shocks and the IPD springs. Compared to the Bilstein shocks I had
    they were rock hard though.

    That being said I'd use them again, but for me the price was right for those
    shocks. Figure in the cost of replacing the shock mounts too, in my case
    they were needed all around.
     
    Franz Bestuchev, Apr 1, 2005
    #4
  5. jbcrow

    Rob Guenther Guest

    What kind of a ride did he say they give, and what kind of a ride are you
    expecting?

    If you want a stiffer ride you can get stiffer shocks, if you want
    compliant, get shocks that are known to be more compliant. Your mechanic
    should be able to give you a recommendation based on how YOU drive the car,
    get him to take a ride with you, let him see how you handle corners, if you
    like to have some fun on winding roads, then drive on those roads, if you
    carry 4-5 people a lot, talk about upgrading to firmer shocks and even
    stiffer springs.

    Went with Volvo stock on our 1993 960, just 1000kms ago (has 161K Kms)...
    old shocks were getting, well... old... new stuff brought back the quality
    ride.

    Went with Koni adjustable shocks on our 1999.5 VW Golf (done at 95K Kms, car
    has 123K Kms now)... These shocks make the car!!.... I never told people I
    got those shocks and everyone was commenting on how nice my car drove down
    the road - they are firmer then stock, but they seem to be more compliant,
    especially with 4 people in the car... It's now a fun car to drive hard
    through corners... SOMEHOW with the Volvo I will drive down the same twisty
    roads faster - maybe because it's rear wheel drive/better balanced car...
    maybe cuz they weigh about the same, but the Volvo is on a much larger
    wheelbase? Who knows... The Golf leans less, but it understeers more.
     
    Rob Guenther, Apr 1, 2005
    #5
  6. jbcrow

    Jim Carriere Guest

    I've had Blisteins on for three or four years now (nothing wrong with
    the originals). They're a lot of money up front, about $400 just for
    parts. They really do work better. For example, right away I
    noticed the ABS would rarely kick on on bumpy surfaces. With the
    original shocks it would often make a few sharp clicks in the brake
    pedal during even moderate braking over things like train tracks or
    manhole covers.

    I'm not convinced they are worth the extra money for most people.
    I'm still happy with them and don't regret my own decision at all,
    but that's my car and my money, not your car and your money. If you
    enjoy the act of driving any car, fast or slow, you may be happy with
    Bilsteins. If you have the car because it has been a good appliance
    all these years, you may not enjoy spending that much money on shocks.
     
    Jim Carriere, Apr 1, 2005
    #6
  7. I only used OEM replacements (only Volvo dealer service) on my '93 850
    and frankly I don't remember ever replacing them in 180,000 miles. On my
    '95 850 with 110,000 miles the same is true. They were so good and
    lasted so long that it just doesn't ring a bell. Perhaps your mechanic
    wants more work and profit than OEMs provide.
     
    Stephen Henning, Apr 1, 2005
    #7
  8. jbcrow

    AJ MacLeod Guest

    He's wrong. I don't doubt you might get _slightly_ better handling from
    vastly more expensive shocks. If you have the money to throw away, good
    and well.

    I've just replaced my rear shocks at 130k miles (93 850 saloon) with
    OEMs (you're right, they're Boge/Sachs) and they've restored the handling
    of the car to what it was - pretty good for a car of that size and
    weight. They didn't introduce any jarring, either - our roads are not
    noted for their smoothness so that's important to me.

    Let's face it, much as I love my 850 (and particularly the looks of the
    early version) it's getting on now, and spending over the odds to achieve
    dubious or fairly insignificant gains is just stupid.

    I would say though, I wish I'd replaced the springs too - I think I'll be
    doing that soon. I replaced the upper mounts because I'd ordered new
    ones, but the old ones were actually in very good condition.

    AJ
     
    AJ MacLeod, Apr 1, 2005
    #8
  9. jbcrow

    James Sweet Guest

    The OEM shocks are fine if you like the way it handles, Bilstein will give
    you very noticeably more sporty handling, whether you want that or not is up
    to you.
     
    James Sweet, Apr 2, 2005
    #9
  10. jbcrow

    Spanky Guest

    I replaced the OEM Sachs struts in my 2000 S80 with the "Touring" Bilsteins
    and, frankly, I'm sorry I went that route. They are too stiff (too much
    compression damping) for wet bumpy roads. I actually have less traction with
    the Bilsteins than with the OEM Sachs with one blown damper. Worse on snow
    and ice as well. On dry pavement they give a sporty feeling ride but I'm not
    convinced they offer any more road-holding and they are quite jarring. I
    know the proper struts were installed but perhaps Bilstein engineers
    miscalculated the damping needed for the S80 and, being a low volume car,
    nobody has bothered to correct the problem. The Bilsteins for another model
    may be fine but, from what I've heard from others, the Bilstein Touring
    series are more sport than touring and, in the case of the S80 replacements,
    I wouldn't even say they are more sporty if they don't give more
    roadholding. I would hate to find out what the "Sport" Bilsteins feel like
    on an S80.....

    If I did it again I would either use the OEM Sachs which actually worked
    very well had one of them not blown out at 60,000 miles or I would see if
    Koni makes something to fit.

    Spanky
     
    Spanky, Apr 7, 2005
    #10
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.