P
Peter H.M.Brooks
I've wondered for a long time why anybody would buy a Volvo. They're
ugly, though recent models are a little less so, and built like a brick.
They also affect the minds of fairly normal (I said fairly) who are
turned into that dangerous and stupid road beast, the Volvo driver,
something rather like a rhino, short-sighted, aggressive and only able
to move in straight lines, usually fairly slowly.
The only excuse that I've heard is that, being built like a brick
shit-house Volvo drivers can keep their sprogs uncrushed despite their
bad driving.
It turns out that I was wrong. Apparently the back seats of revolves are
the most comfortable mobile bonk locations. I'm not sure if Rolls Royces
and Winnebagos were included in the survey, and I'm surprised that jags
don't feature as their seats are quite squishy, but it is probably the
sheer width that gives them the edge - or maybe those funny barred
headrests give a good purchase. I'm not sure, the article said that they
were best, not exactly why.
What's odd is that revolves tend to be driven by middle-aged wage-slave
types who can, presumably, bonk at home. When have they had the
opportunity or inclination to find out enough to fill in the survey? If
anything, I'd have expected them to carry out adulterous limbo dancing
in the bog at the local Sainsbury's or in their shed on the allotment.
Or could it be that the sprogs, protected from crushing over all these
years in their brick on wheels are forced to rebel when teenagers
borrowing the car? It would make sense, I suppose.
ugly, though recent models are a little less so, and built like a brick.
They also affect the minds of fairly normal (I said fairly) who are
turned into that dangerous and stupid road beast, the Volvo driver,
something rather like a rhino, short-sighted, aggressive and only able
to move in straight lines, usually fairly slowly.
The only excuse that I've heard is that, being built like a brick
shit-house Volvo drivers can keep their sprogs uncrushed despite their
bad driving.
It turns out that I was wrong. Apparently the back seats of revolves are
the most comfortable mobile bonk locations. I'm not sure if Rolls Royces
and Winnebagos were included in the survey, and I'm surprised that jags
don't feature as their seats are quite squishy, but it is probably the
sheer width that gives them the edge - or maybe those funny barred
headrests give a good purchase. I'm not sure, the article said that they
were best, not exactly why.
What's odd is that revolves tend to be driven by middle-aged wage-slave
types who can, presumably, bonk at home. When have they had the
opportunity or inclination to find out enough to fill in the survey? If
anything, I'd have expected them to carry out adulterous limbo dancing
in the bog at the local Sainsbury's or in their shed on the allotment.
Or could it be that the sprogs, protected from crushing over all these
years in their brick on wheels are forced to rebel when teenagers
borrowing the car? It would make sense, I suppose.