Ford Is Selling Volvo !!!

Discussion in 'Volvo Parts For Sale / Trade' started by Steve, Feb 26, 2004.

  1. Steve

    Linkster82 Guest

    I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

    It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

    Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

    Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

    With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
     
    Linkster82, Mar 1, 2004
    #41
  2. Steve

    Linkster82 Guest

    I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

    It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

    Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

    Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

    With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
     
    Linkster82, Mar 1, 2004
    #42
  3. Steve

    Linkster82 Guest

    I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

    It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

    Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

    Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

    With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
     
    Linkster82, Mar 1, 2004
    #43
  4. Steve

    Linkster82 Guest

    I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

    It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

    Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

    Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

    With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
     
    Linkster82, Mar 1, 2004
    #44
  5. Steve

    Linkster82 Guest

    I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford than an aston martin.

    It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.

    Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.

    Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive. You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the firewall.

    With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
     
    Linkster82, Mar 1, 2004
    #45
  6. Steve

    Proconsul Guest

    Hooray! Finally somebody who reflects the truth and speaks with common sense
    on this issue!!!

    PC

    | I am surprised at many of you. For Volvo enthusiasts, your knowledge of
    Volvo and the Volvo/Ford relationship is very inaccurate. The S80 was
    designed by volvo engineers/designers almost ten years ago. The marriage
    with Ford brough Volvo the capital to develop the S80. Therefore any
    derivative thereof has been all-volvo. Like the S60. This is no more ford
    than an aston martin.
    |
    | It saddens me to think that you all believe Volvo has gone in the wrong
    direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard owners of the
    200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out. Or the 800 series.
    Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no less safe and no less
    durable than they were twenty years ago. You ahve to drive a volvo long
    enough to find that out. And just because one component breaks doesn't mean
    the whole thing is terrible.
    |
    | Additionally, the only thing shared between the new S40 and the Ford Focus
    is the chassis. Let's learn the basics people.
    |
    | Also, you might think the 850 was the first volvo with front wheel drive.
    You're wrong. the 400 series was front wheel drive in the 80's. Having a
    transverse engine also gives a car's frame more give in an accident, and
    provides a barrier for a collision, without throwing the engine through the
    firewall.
    |
    | With the exception of Jaguar, the PAG has been really autonomous in their
    workings. And the S40 is finally more a volvo than a japanese car. Don't
    like the styling? Buy a used 740. This is where volvo is going, and
    frankly, I like it (and I drove a 740 for 14 years).
    |
     
    Proconsul, Mar 2, 2004
    #46
  7. Steve

    Patrik Guest

    This is not true. They have a lot of shared components (streering,
    underbody, supension etc). The new Ford Focus, Mazda 3 and Volvo S40
    are a joint developing project.

    /Patrik
     
    Patrik, Mar 2, 2004
    #47
  8. Steve

    Patrik Guest

    Depends on the price. Factories in Euroupe where salaries are high
    might be sold to a relocalisation company that guts the factory and
    ships the equipment to India or Asia. Ford might do this themselves as
    well, but I dont think so. They've got many production sites through
    their accusitions, and they will probably be on the lookout to sell
    when they think they'll get a fair price.

    /Patrik
     
    Patrik, Mar 2, 2004
    #48
  9. We are surprised and surprised and surprised and surprised and surprised
    at you. You posted the same article 5 times.
    The Volvo 480ES, introduced in 1986, was a front-drive hatchback. The
    480 used a 1.7 Renault engine, and was built in the Netherlands at the
    Volvo BV plant. Did the Born, Netherlands, group design the 850?????
     
    Stephen M. Henning, Mar 2, 2004
    #49
  10. Steve

    Steve S Guest

    But the DESIGN of the S60 still sucks big time!!! I know, I have one
    and will soon get rid of it. My experience with the S60 may chase me
    away from Volvo for good - too bad because we used to be very die-hard
    and loyal. The direction Volvo is going is similar to so many of the
    ricers - lots of fluff, very little substance.

    wrong direction with their design. But what do you think die-hard
    owners of the 200 series were thinking when the 700 series came out.
    Or the 800 series. Or even a five cylinder engine! Volvo's are no
    less safe and no less durable than they were twenty years ago. You
    ahve to drive a volvo long enough to find that out. And just because
    one component breaks doesn't mean the whole thing is terrible.
     
    Steve S, Mar 2, 2004
    #50
  11. Steve

    John Horner Guest

    Just like a Lincoln Town Car is built out of much better parts than is it's
    half price cousin the Ford Crown Victoria ... oh yeah, the Town Car uses
    almost all of the same mechanical parts as does the Crown Vic.

    What make you think that Ford will do any better with the Mazda/Volvo
    vehicle than it has with the Jaguar X-type?


    John
     
    John Horner, Mar 4, 2004
    #51
  12. Steve

    John Horner Guest

    I'm surprised that you don't know how to use usenet. The same post 5
    times?
     
    John Horner, Mar 4, 2004
    #52
  13. Exactly. Ford is the Microsoft of automakers. They make bland,
    soulless, buggy implimentations of other people's ideas. It's
    good enough for the rental fleets and that's all they really care
    about.
     
    Joseph Oberlander, Mar 4, 2004
    #53
  14. The Jaguar X-type is just a fancy Ford Contour. However it is quite
    reliable. Much more reliable than the old Jags XJs.
     
    Stephen M. Henning, Mar 4, 2004
    #54
  15. Steve

    Myron Samila Guest

    Also to note, Fiat group SpA wanted to buy Volvo before Ford did.

    The plan didn't go through, which is too bad, it would have saved Fiat.

    Fiat group owns

    Alfa Romeo
    Maserati
    Ferrari
    Lancia

    and a whole whack of other companies. Now Fiat is in trouble, and if Fiat had bought
    Volvo at the time, most likely the cars would have been shared on Alfa Romeo platforms.

    The Alfa Romeo 156 is proving to be a good car (although, sadly, we don't get Alfa or any
    Fiat product other than Ferrari and Maserati in North America).
     
    Myron Samila, Mar 5, 2004
    #55
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.