Is car safety technology replacing common sense?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Stan, Nov 8, 2007.

  1. Stan

    Jim Warman Guest

    Unsure as I am about which NG you are replying to, I congratulate you on
    being one voice of sanity....

    Auto makers are desparately trying to reduce their exposure to frivilous
    lawsuits and are introducing "vehicle dynamic systems"..... Small wonder in
    a society where people don't expect a cup of coffee to be "hot".

    Many years ago, I spent insufficient time trying to learn how to be a good
    race driver... I learned a lot - but, since you aren't watching me Sunday
    afternoon - earning a whole whack of money for going real fast and turning
    left - I didn't make it. But I did come away with a better than average idea
    of vehicle dynamics and the physics implicated....

    I welcome my ABS.... I don't have to spend time modulating brake pressure...
    Interestingly, if I did modulate my brake pressure right - my ABS would
    never cycle....

    I recently purchased an 05 Mustang for my loving bride.... This car has a
    traction control system. If I wanted to be an abject idiot, this system has
    the possibilty of changing my day.... If I use my head, the system enhances
    my driving experience....

    Electronic controls will never mitigate "stupid"..... but they go a long way
    to keeping "ooops" from happening....
     
    Jim Warman, Nov 10, 2007
    #21
  2. Stan

    Pete C. Guest

    The one you trimmed out:
    The clear case where the manufacturers have done nothing to address a
    safety defect in their ABS systems since the fix would probably increase
    the manufacturing cost $10 for the additional sensor needed to detect
    the fault condition.
     
    Pete C., Nov 10, 2007
    #22
  3. Stan

    Howard Guest

    IMO

    As well as I think the biggest benefit of these technologies is for those
    drivers who are less skilled than they think they are, which so far as I can
    tell, make up a all of the drivers on the road.

    HTN
     
    Howard, Nov 10, 2007
    #23
  4. Stan

    Duncan Guest

    The system can be only as good as the people who design it. I remember when
    ABS braking first came out they put them on commercial trucks first
    (mandated by Federal Law) and more than a few good drivers lost their lifes
    because of a flawed braking system. It got so bad that one State even went
    against the Feds and Ban the Trucks with the ABS system.... the brakes were
    releasing and guys just couldn't get stopped or the brakes wouldn't release
    at all and the driver would miss a few days of work while they tried to get
    his truck to move out of the parking lot. A few years later, after the
    'bugs' were supposedly worked out, they started putting them on cars. That
    computer sensory stuff is dangerous. It might be just dandy if everything is
    working OK, but eventually it will malfunction and it could cost you your
    life. (just like airbags were killing short people & children when they
    first came out). That crap is why your $5000 plastic car sells for $30000.
     
    Duncan, Nov 14, 2007
    #24
  5. Stan

    80 Knight Guest

    Usually when the ABS system detects a problem, it deactivates itself, and
    you have standard brakes.
     
    80 Knight, Nov 14, 2007
    #25
  6. Have had ABS for years. No problems.

    DAS

    For direct replies replace nospam with schmetterling
    ---
     
    Dori A Schmetterling, Nov 14, 2007
    #26
  7. It seems my safe driving record will be equalled by some fool in a modern
    car with out a clue of any drivng skills .Loud music texting arguing
    speeding no worries the technoledgy will compensate just like spell checkers
    eh?
     
    John Robertson, Nov 17, 2007
    #27
  8. Stan

    Roadie Guest

    Well, if that is the case then what you might want to do is start
    driving something very simple with no safety features, mechanical
    brakes and a touring top. Have fun....
     
    Roadie, Nov 17, 2007
    #28
  9. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    But was the reason you needed to swerve in the first place a result of
    following too close or driving too fast for the conditions? I'd
    actually rather let stupid drivers get hurt instead of have their
    vehicle rescue their clumsy ass.
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 18, 2007
    #29
  10. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    Seems like the easier, cheaper and safer solution is to make it harder
    to get a driver's license, and easier for incompetent drivers to lose
    their license. The tolerance most states have for bad driving is
    unbelievable, especially in the southwest (California with it's
    complete lack of ability to enforce it's license requirements, Arizona
    with effectively permanent licenses...).

    Just retest everybody every time their license renewal comes up,
    regardless of age or driving record. And make drivers licenses expire
    at least as often as registration tags, if not sooner.
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 18, 2007
    #30
  11. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    Actually, I will. I have a tendancy to pull in too close ahead of
    people hiding in my blind spot due to lack of windows other than the
    windshield and cab doors on my Tradesman (though I would argue that
    the other driver is a co-moron to such an incident for hiding in an
    obviously blind spot of a large vehicle). The blind spot eliminator
    fisheye is also no help when the co-moron is driving a highway-colored
    vehicle (tan, grey, silver, white, black and similar colors) and is
    not driving with their lights on, especially under conditions they're
    required to be lit up anyway (in tunnels, driving in the rain or fog,
    on roads with poor visibility, etc). Pretty much have to drive as a
    two-man crew to avoid the problem.
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 18, 2007
    #31
  12. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    That might not entirely be a bad thing if it means we get a functional
    transportation infrastructure that isn't so mismanaged that the only
    possible tools for many jobs are expensive (for the average household)
    airline tickets and personal cars. Pretty much the rest of the first
    world, even over geographically large, population sparse areas tend to
    have better mass transit than you will find in most North American
    cities (and pretty much all but New York, Seattle and Portland in the
    US).
    I think airbags could be cost justified if the steering wheel airbag
    was replaced with a steel pike by mandate. If collisions resulted in
    gauranteed death to the driver, that might just provide enough
    incentive to make bad drivers and Californians learn what they're
    doing before they get behind the wheel.
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 19, 2007
    #32
  13. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    How often does one see adults at school bus stops after the first week
    of school? Seems like any parent who is going to take enough time out
    of their morning to wait for the bus with their kids is just going to
    drive them in themselves anyway...
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 19, 2007
    #33
  14. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    Along those same lines, I have a real hard time with people who are
    pissed off about terrorism but think Daylight Savings Time is a good
    thing, given that on an average year, DST kills about 6000 Americans
    on US highways per year due to fatigue resulting from needlessly
    screwing with people's sleep, and terrorism, on it's worst year, kills
    about 3000 Americans.
    I'd rather have the safety-device overdependant, and the God's Gift to
    Tires types both did not have driver's licenses.

    http://learn.to/quote please...
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 19, 2007
    #34
  15. Stan

    Paul Johnson Guest

    Wait, there's brakes that aren't fundamentally mechanical? How the
    hell do those work, given what it's trying to stop is mechanical?
     
    Paul Johnson, Nov 19, 2007
    #35
  16. So the stupid driver swerves and also takes out your mother, wife, and lazy
    brother in law, but if the stupid driver is killed too, you'd rejoice?
    Brilliant thinking.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Nov 19, 2007
    #36
  17. Stan

    Steve Guest


    IMO there's a difference between real safety equipment and nanny-isms.

    Take lawnmowers for example: deflectors and shields that prevent the
    mower from throwing a rock straight in the operators face are real,
    practical, valid safety devices and have been around since the 50s.

    Blade brakes and "dead man" switches, on the other hand, are
    nanny-devices that replace the common sense skills that I was taught by
    age 10: "Don't stick your hand under a running mower, and turn it off if
    you walk away from it."


    In the same vein, brake/gearshift interlocks on cars are nanny devices
    that replace the common-sense training of "put your damn foot on the
    brake when you shift into gear unless you are 100% ready for the car to
    move."
     
    Steve, Nov 19, 2007
    #37
  18. Stan

    Roadie Guest

    I was thinking more of devices like ABS, seat belts, dual braking
    system, disc brakes, air bags, safety glass, improved suspensions,
    improved tires, etc. But yes it is also a good idea to have a car
    that can't be started unless it is in park and the foot is on the
    brake. I wish we didn't have to design cars for the lowest common
    denominator, but we do.
     
    Roadie, Nov 19, 2007
    #38
  19. Stan

    Roadie Guest

    Most automotive brakes are hydra-mechanical but the name is
    abbreviated to hydraulic. I was speaking of mechanical brakes
    actuated with with rods connected to a pedal.
     
    Roadie, Nov 19, 2007
    #39
  20. And here was I thinking that the '"dead man" switch' was to make sure
    that the self-propelled mower, snow thrower, etc., wouldn't just keep
    charging ahead if the operator slipped and fell or actually even dropped
    dead. How silly of me!

    Perce
     
    Percival P. Cassidy, Nov 19, 2007
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.